Difference between revisions of "Talk:Nomorenomicon"
Hackney-Sack (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I resent the claim made at the top, the Nomore-Nomicon only represents session two. If you want you could either delete the statement or I would be happy to consult you on how to include the traditions of session 1. | I resent the claim made at the top, the Nomore-Nomicon only represents session two. If you want you could either delete the statement or I would be happy to consult you on how to include the traditions of session 1. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The claim at the top is on the cover of the Nomicon. Take it up with Polveroj. Also, did I really write "Philip Punn" in my comment about his impending patch? I find that hard to believe. -Shackney | ||
Revision as of 23:21, 21 March 2009
In section 0.5, the universal opposing elements of reality are refered to as both "Bing and Bong" and "Bing and Bang"; are these both correct or is one a typo? -Siri
'Twas a typo. 'Tis fixed. 'Twill remain fixed. --Max W.
What do you mean by "emailing the Alcove, past and present"? That'd be a difficult thing to do, since many people change their email addresses at least once between their nomore year and five years later. Has any thought been put into this aspect of the Nomorenomicon? Ken 16:17, 24 January 2007 (MST)
I resent the claim made at the top, the Nomore-Nomicon only represents session two. If you want you could either delete the statement or I would be happy to consult you on how to include the traditions of session 1.
The claim at the top is on the cover of the Nomicon. Take it up with Polveroj. Also, did I really write "Philip Punn" in my comment about his impending patch? I find that hard to believe. -Shackney
